🔗 Share this article

Families of people laid to rest in resting places vulnerable to shoreline retreat say that a lack of decision on how best to tackle the issue is creating unnecessary distress about the eternal homes of their departed family.

A Looming Threat to Ancient Churchyards

The council have singled out three church graveyards in the communities of Happisburgh, Trimingham, and Mundesley as being in danger of being engulfed by the sea in the next few generations.

A recent report on the situation sets out a series of options, from taking no action to exhuming remains and relocating them in more secure locations. Authorities say it is for local people to determine how to move forward.

“At the moment we’re in limbo. It causes me distress. They intended this to serve as their final resting place, but it isn’t going to be because of the encroaching sea.”

Projections indicate at least a portion of one churchyard could fall into the sea in the next 80 years, but some residents fear it will happen much sooner. “In my view it’s got under 20 years, if you look at what’s happened in the last 30 years,” one said.

Troubled by the Past

A local business owner recalled a school trip to the nearby settlement of Eccles, which has largely vanished into the sea, including its church and graveyard.

“It was possible to see human remains,” she said. “Certain people hold this idealized notion that people’s remains will just get washed out to the ocean. That is not the case. People will collect remains as souvenirs and go plundering graves in search of valuables. It’s completely disrespectful.”

“I’m worried that the same thing that happened at Eccles will occur here and there’ll be skeletons on the shore. I’d be appalled by that.”

A Soldier's Grave in Peril

Along the coast is situated the grave of a ex-soldier killed while working overseas. His mother said she could not sleep after learning her son’s grave might one day be relocated.

“It does disturb me to think this may not remain his permanent home,” she said. “To our family it’s an important site to visit.”

She believes, new interments should cease but says it is too soon to exhume existing graves. “My preference for now is to take no action and closely monitor, but an early decision needs to be made when a critical moment has been attained.”

Seeking Answers and Clarity

An absence of consensus over when and how to tackle the problem has resulted in grieving relatives feeling exasperated and anxious.

Some are calling for additional sea defences to delay the inevitable erosion and to allow funerals to continue for now. Different voices argue the time for relocation is drawing near.

“The situation is very emotional,” said one relative. “The official study was really good, but now there’s uncertainty about how it is implemented. And all parties is avoiding responsibility over who is accountable.”

A local official confirmed the graveyards were under the care of the local diocese. “In the end it is up to them to choose the direction to take. Our role is here to help support them through that process with communities.”

He added there was time to consider all the options. “We are talking decades before it begins getting lost.”

“There is no unified opinion on what should happen yet. We need good community discussions to discover the appropriate solutions for each village.”

The possibility of losing the historic sites was described as one of “immense sorrow for the local community,” but faith leaders also referenced a doctrine in resurrection, offering a spiritual perspective on the physical disappearance of sacred ground.