🔗 Share this article

Out-of-pocket costs. In-network. Out-of-network. Concierge medical services. Personal healthcare costs. Co-payment. Co-insurance. Benefit advisers. Insurance brokers. Healthcare consultants. ACA. Health Maintenance Organization. Preferred Provider Organization. EPO. POS. HDHP. HSA. Flexible Spending Account. Health Reimbursement Arrangement. Explanation of Benefits. COBRA. SHOP. Individual coverage. Family coverage. Insurance subsidies.

Baffled? You should be. Who understands this complex system? Certainly not the average business owner. Neither the average worker. Selecting the right healthcare insurance for companies – or for our families – seems like demands advanced expertise in medical insurance.

The Healthcare System Isn't Just Complicated, It Is Expensive

Based on recent research, typical households pays $twenty-seven thousand annually for their health insurance (up 6% compared to last year). Typical company healthcare expense is projected to exceed $17,000 per employee in 2026, an increase of 9.5% compared to 2025.

Now federal operations has ceased functioning due to partisan disputes over tax credits that experts say will lead to a doubling of premiums for numerous US citizens.

When Will We Seriously Consider National Health Insurance?

When will we seriously consider universal healthcare coverage here in America? I'm convinced we're getting closer because this situation is unsustainable.

I'm not suggesting government-run medicine. I'm proposing that our already existing Medicare system – an insurance system – merely extend to cover everyone. Our infrastructure doesn't change. How medical professionals get paid changes. Believe me, they will adjust.

How Universal Coverage Could Function

Universal healthcare coverage would require payments from both workers and companies. In comparable systems, a worker earning average wages pays about five point three percent to their healthcare. The company pays approximately thirteen point seventy-five percent.

Does this appear expensive? Not if you contrast it to what average US resident spends. I know multiple clients that are easily contributing between eight to fifteen percent of their employee wages to their healthcare costs. And keep in mind that with comprehensive systems, those payments also cover pension plans, illness coverage, parental benefits and job loss protection in addition to supporting healthcare facilities. When including those costs versus our current spending on retirement programs, job loss coverage and paid time off, the difference decreases.

Implementation for America

For America, universal healthcare funding would raise our Medicare tax deduction, a system that is already in place. It ought to be means-based – wealthier individuals would contribute higher amounts than those earning less. This includes both worker and company payments. Similar to many federal defense, IT, social programs and infrastructure, the program could be managed to third-party administrators rather than a government office.

Benefits for Entrepreneurs

A national health insurance program would be a significant advantage for entrepreneurs such as my company. It would place us on a level playing field against big corporations that can pay for better plans. It would render administration much easier (a payroll deduction processed similarly to social security and Medicare taxes, instead of individual transactions to benefit firms and coverage administrators).

It would make simpler for us to budget annual expenditures, rather than enduring the complicated (and fruitless) process of bargaining with the big insurance providers that we must do every year. Due to simplification, there would exist improved comprehension about benefits among workers – contrasted with existing arrangements where they have to decipher the complexities of current options. And there would definitely exist less liability for employers since we wouldn't would be privy to our employees' medical records for purposes of weighing risks and alternative plans.

Free-Market Viewpoint

I'm as pro-market as they get. But I've learned that government play important functions in our lives, including national security to supporting needed infrastructure. Providing healthcare for everyone through a national insurance system enhances our economy's infrastructure. It represents superior, easier system for entrepreneurs which hire the majority of the country's workers and fund half of our GDP. It enables employees to enjoy better health, have better attendance and increase productivity.

Addressing Concerns

Exist numerous factors I'm not addressing? Certainly. But with rising medical expenses we've seen in recent years, it's clear that current healthcare legislation is not working very well. I understand that America isn't a small, Scandinavian country where big changes can be readily adopted. But expanding universal Medicare, despite the additional taxes that would be incurred, would remain a superior and more affordable approach both for controlling healthcare costs and ensuring coverage to everyone.

Time for Honest Assessment

As Americans, must reduce our own arrogance. Our healthcare system isn't so great. The US places significantly behind many other countries in healthcare quality globally, according to comprehensive research. Maybe one bright spot in this present circumstances is that we undertake a hard look at ourselves and acknowledge that major reforms are necessary.