🔗 Share this article

Recently, the game developers introduced a new playlist titled Casual Breakthrough. In essence, this option mirrors the regular Breakthrough setup but features a few notable adjustments:

• Each team has just eight human participants, with the rest made up of AI-controlled opponents.
• Actions performed by human gamers grant complete experience points, while AI activities offer lower rewards.
• Only two locations are available: Siege of Cairo and Empire State.
• Elements like Dogtags, accolades, and career stat updates are disabled.

So essentially, this mode lives up to its name: it's a laid-back version of Breakthrough. On the surface, one could assume there's nothing wrong, since it provides additional choices for players looking for different methods to enjoy the game. However, if video games have taught us anything, it's that not everyone will be happy. In other words, a lot of Battlefield 6 players are upset.

Player Responses: From Fury to Support

"People want human opponents. Don't repeat the errors of your competitors," reads one reply to the mode reveal. "Truly disappointing concept," says another. Meanwhile, in community forums, a player notes, "I have no idea where we are going with this title," while someone else details all the issues they consider to be problematic in the game: "Fix bugs, fix drone glitch, correct rocket mechanics, fix [the] bloom after sprinting bug, fix awful hit registration. We don't need this AI-heavy playlist."

On the other hand, for every complaint, there are players sharing how much they're liking the recent addition. "It's very fun to practice, real players prevent it from being a total farmfest but it's quite laid-back," says one Reddit comment. "The community fails to see that there are players who have lives and can't play this game 24/7. Allow them to find a middle ground," adds a different comment. A response via social media explains that as they're "a parent gamer with limited time, this is perfect for me," and someone else praises the mode for "not being overcompetitive."

Constructive Criticisms and Player Feedback

Despite the support, players have valid points to complain about the new mode. Some users have highlighted that it will make wait times even longer for other modes because of the large amount of playlists in the game already. Similarly, certain regions often face mostly bots in the existing playlists. It also seems somewhat counterintuitive that the mode does not begin without a required amount of human gamers, even though it focuses mostly on combat against bots.

Finally, a major complaints is that a previous feature was meant to offer full XP, even against bots, but that was removed when they tried to eliminate XP farming from the mode. Thus Casual Breakthrough feels like the player base meeting them in the middle, as per forum feedback. Another labels this addition as the developers "dropping the ball significantly, I experienced great enjoyment in the first couple of days, why did they feel the need to change it?"

Future Prospects: Adjustments Be Made?

If the development team has demonstrated something to date with the latest installment, it is that they're paying attention and responding to feedback. Assignments that were overly hard were adjusted rapidly, just like the specific battle pass objectives. It is likely that, should analytics indicates this new playlist is underperforming to their standards, they won't be shy to change it again.