🔗 Share this article

"Half of my personal history is saved on this app, and unexpectedly they expect us to fork out money for it."

One-star ratings and a perception of unfairness have taken over social media conversations since Snapchat emerged as the most recent digital platform to put a price tag on a function that individuals previously enjoyed using for without payment.

The company behind Snapchat revealed in the fall that it would begin imposing fees users if they have over five gigabytes worth of previously shared photos and recordings stored as the Memories feature.

Among numerous users, these old snaps act as a window to the past – prompting some to criticize the company of "corporate greed" in comments on social media and unfavorable reviews on mobile app marketplaces.

Alternative Options

Snapchat's parent has equated its paid storage plans to those offered by major companies for handsets.

For those seeking another option for those who don't want to pay, users have the ability to export their Memories – which for many people amount to significant data – to their device.

The company mentioned that only a limited group of subscribers would be affected by the new policy.

It also acknowledged that it was "inherently difficult to transition from receiving a service for free to subscribing to it" – but suggested it would be "worth the cost" for subscribers.

A significant number of denouncing the move online seem to disagree.

Public Outcry

A digital campaign labeled the fee a "memory tax", with users labeling it "Orwellian" and "ridiculous" – while a user promised to abandon the application again.

In parallel, in a one-star review on the digital platform, a user calling themselves a pseudonymous user said it felt "deeply unfair".

"Based on my understanding of millennials, most of us have years worth of memories on the platform," they wrote. "The vast majority only kept the app mostly for this purpose. Five gigabytes is insufficient when you have a long timeline of recordings... Goodbye to the app."

Additionally, a journalism student, a 20-year-old media studies major in the UK capital, posted on TikTok her decision to remove the application.

"I concluded that I needed to download all my memories as immediately," she stated. "Nearly every part of my teenage years have been captured through my archived posts, all of the images in there are really important to me."

"This seems illogical to demand payment people for a feature that has been complimentary for such a long time."

Unknown Fees

The company has yet to announce how much subscription tiers would cost in the UK – only that they are part of a "phased international launch".

Yet a London resident Amber Daley, who is based in London, said in a video on the social platform that she would be "distraught" by the new costs.

Amber explained that the app had become "a part of everyday life" since she started using it in the past.

Although she acknowledged she accepted the app needed to earn income, she suggested that the archival function holds greater significance than the company may have understood.

"In my opinion it's quite an unfair step to demand payment from your subscribers who have been faithful and dedicated," she said. "These aren't just called Memories, these are our genuine personal moments."

Professional Insight

Businesses opting to impose fees from subscribers for a feature that was previously free is a common practice, and millions pay for services like cloud storage solutions to save their photos and videos from their handset.

The reality of archiving content in the online servers – which some in the technology sector often describe as simply "a remote system" – is that it involves expenses.

"Hosting vast amounts of archived media on Snapchat requires significant resources," online expert a tech commentator stated. "The company has to attempt to identify a method to offset the expenses of data retention, network usage, copies, file sharing, security measures – all that stuff."

However the consultant indicated that imposing charges for a feature that had previously been free, and users had been prompted to utilize as such, may feel like a "misleading tactic" for certain individuals.

"Changing the rules after individuals have created this massive online collection seems unfair," he noted. For numerous users, he continued, "Archived media exceeds mere information, they're sentimental records."

The sentiment was reflected by those leaving unfavorable comments, with an individual describing their archived media "deeply important to me".

"The stored media includes each part of my experiences within them from joyful events like births, grieving for lost relatives, memories with friends/family, [and] my whole teenage years," they expressed.

Expert Analysis

An academic expert, a research fellow at Utrecht University in the Holland, stated that Snapchat's move demonstrates the ramifications of business-oriented apps being used to store sentimental personal content.

"The companies profit from this trust, mutual reliance, and presumption of never-ending access, which even motivates many people to continue using the app or continue to use it in order to scroll back through their stored media," she explained to journalists. "However these are not altruistic protectors of private remembrance."